Monday, February 8, 2010

Controversy over new photo magazine "Pilfered"

I have been seeing more and more comments and controversy over this magazine so I just had to let you all know the scoop...Lisa

The magazine's website states "PILFERED is a place where artists, photographers, designers, and the inspired can submit their favorite visuals pilfered from the web to share with one another. Founded on the spirit of web democracy, and built to aid in communicating ideas and concepts, PILFERED Magazine aims to assist in speaking the thousand words – visually."

I copied and pasted the article from Fast Media Group http://www.fastmediamagazine.com/?p=3753 here for you...

"If you’re a photographer, you should check out this site, Pilfered magazine. Since it’s launch, it has had an angry response from many in the photography community due to its call to submit images for the magazine, which it then intends to use without paying any copyright. On their about page the site is described as follows:

The site is urging readers to actively ‘pilfer’ the web for photography that can be used in the magazine. There will be no payment and credit will only be given if a photographer chases it. The site puts the responsibility with those submitting the content. It appears the team behind the site has spent years using content from the web for commercial presentations and now wants to create a place to share the best work, albeit without paying contributors.

The response from photographers to the site has been one of shock and anger. Many of the comments on the About page threaten with legal action. Both John Harrington and PDN Pulse have written about the website. In their comments they point to the appropriation of content without payment and credit. ‘Robin Hood’ of the web or copyright theft. What’s your opinion? "

No comments: